I’ve been busy scanning things. Well, actually the scanning part is easy, it’s the getting things just perfect afterwards that really chews up time. Unless someone is in a big hurry, I’ve found so far that with black & white and the F335 it’s best to just take the raw files and do all the corrections myself in Photoshop instead of relying on PSI to do it. Unless they’re really low contrast images PSI will overcompensate, and while it’s feasible to just turn down the contrast right there, I’d rather get my black & white images just right. And it takes lots of work.
This is Arista Edu.100/Fomapan 100 which I developed myself in the school darkroom (first roll in a year!) using D-76 1:1 developed for (I think) 9min. I had already bought my Pakon F335 so I waited until it arrived and this was the first roll through the scanner. edit: I forgot to add, most of these shots are in my local neighborhood, just took them as I walked along one day. #4 was taken from the Wal-Mart parking lot.
I shot this roll in the Olympus Trip 35, more from the same roll as this. I have to say, that little camera is quite handy to have, especially in winter. It’s simple to use, even with gloves on, and it fits quite nicely in a coat pocket. This is only my first roll through it, but I could already tell it wouldn’t be the last. It’s got a sharp lens and I don’t think the Fomapan does it justice, I have a feeling this would be a great camera for landscapes with Ektar 100. With a 40mm f/2.8 lens I would have thought that it would be exclusively an outdoors camera but reading this post has changed my mind a bit. I suppose that with the right film, you could get away with just about anything. Cinestill 800T, anyone?
I don’t know what to think about Fomapan. Its grain isn’t too bad and it has a classic grain structure, but nothing really stands out to me about it, it’s hard to form an opinion one way or another. With Kentmere 100, even though its grain is huge for an 100-speed film, I at least think that it has a fantastic character and look to it, and would prefer using it to Fomapan 100 for most things, except maybe landscapes like we have here. I suppose the price being right, it was a good film to try out, and I do have another roll which I plan on putting through something I’m a bit more familiar with like a Spotmatic, but I don’t think it will become a standby for me. It is however, quite cheap to buy. One thing I remember reading (after the fact, unfortunately) is that it really should be pulled somewhere under 100, and also the developing times are too aggressive and if overdeveloped the highlights can bunch up quick. The chart hanging on our wall said 8-10 minutes in D-76 1:1, I really should have gone for 8 (or less) instead of 9, especially with all the snow and overcast skies, but I suppose I’ll know for next time.